Василиса▶ Я жду вашего обращения. Что Вы хотите узнать?
Логотип
Talk:Pageviews Analysis - Meta Talk:Pageviews AnalysisFrom Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki

Pageviews Analysis – Documentation Feedback forum Issue tracker GitHub translatewiki.net #wikimedia-cloud connect

Welcome to the Pageviews Analysis feedback forum

This is the forum to provide feature requests, bug reports, and general feedback for the Pageviews Analysis suite of tools.

Some key notes when making a post:

Shortcut :
WT:PAGEVIEWS
Archives Archives

2016: Q2 · Q3 · Q4

2017: Q1 · Q2 · Q3 · Q4

2018: Q1 · Q2 · Q3 · Q4

2019: Q1 · Q2 · Q3 · Q4

2020: Q1 · Q2 · Q3

Threads older than 15 daysmay be archived by ArchiverBot ContentsPageview here differs from statistics[ edit ]

Siteviews Analysis here show for swwiki in July total of 2.026.777. pageviews.

https://pageviews.toolforge.org/siteviews/?platform=all-access&source=pageviews&agent=user&start=2020-07-01&end=2020-07-31&sites=sw.wikipedia.org

But Stats at https://stats.wikimedia.org/#/sw.wikipedia.org show 4.8 Mio. total pageviews in monthly overview for July.

Who is right?

More difference when I compare Siteviews Analysis looking for devices used. Here mobile views have for years been higher than desktop views for swwiki, if I remember correctly.

For 2020 the relationship is 3 Mio desktop views to 12.7 Mio mobile web views;

in Wikimedia Statistics https://stats.wikimedia.org/#/sw.wikipedia.org/reading/total-page-views/normal|bar|all|access~desktop*mobile-app*mobile-web|monthly the numbers are generally higher (see above) but here it is 20 Mio desktop views to 15.4 Mio mobile web views (mobile app very few)

So also here: who is right? If I remember some strategy discussions, consequences were drawn from such numbers.

Kipala

Kipala ( talk ) 14:03, 30 August 2020 (UTC) (I run firefox , win 10)

@ Kipala : Siteviews by default shows only the pageviews from human users. By contrast, Wikistats apparently by default includes pageviews from spiders (search engines) as well as automated programs. If you adjust these parameters accordingly, and make sure the date ranges are the same, you'll get the same figures. For example, compare [1] vs. [2] . Kind regards, MusikAnimal (WMF) ( talk ) 14:25, 2 September 2020 (UTC)Höhle des Aglauros[ edit ]

Bei den folgenden zwei Wiki-Einträgen wird die Höhle des Aglauros falsch angegeben auf beiden Einträgen wird sie bei 21 angegeben Richtig dagegen ist, daß sie im Osten der Akropolis und zwar vor dem Anakion Tempel (dem Heiligtum der Dioskuren) liegt Siehe den richtigen Eintrag III

Falsch bei: I) Peripatos (Akropolis)

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peripatos_(Akropolis)

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peripatos_(Akropolis) Auf dieser Seite ist die ist Aglaureion Höhle bei 27 und nicht bei 21 Bei 21 befindet sich eine mykenische Quelle

II) Akropolis (Athen)

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Akropolis_(Athen)

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Akropolis_(Athen) Bei 21 befindet sich eine mykenische Quelle und nicht die Aglaureion Höhle


Richtig bei III)

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aglaureion Top 10,000 pages?[ edit ]

The old stats.grok.se site had the rankings for the top 10,000 pages for a specific month (the month the last top pages list came out) and I wonder if the same could happen for each month for the new tool. It doesn't have to appear as a list but if I view the stats of a page within the top 10,000 of any given month I would like to see where in the 10,000 it ranked. Possible? 2600:1011:B119:429B:F93E:ED1:F1F7:A52E 09:52, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

I made a similar request some time ago. See the response I got - Talk:Pageviews_Analysis/Archives/2020/1#Feature_request:_top_1%,_10% Blue Rasberry (talk) 16:25, 23 September 2020 (UTC)Page count changed[ edit ]

Hi we noticed that during last few days total page count of swwiki went from about 60,300 to 59,500. Were actually pages expunged without showing or did something change in the programme? Kipala ( talk ) 11:52, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

(my other question was answered above already)

Massviews - & (& in URL)[ edit ]

Massviews Do not work with Links that include & (& in URL) Example: Category:Tiffany & Co. ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Tiffany_&_Co .) Error : No data found. Using Chrome on Windows 10 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 185.41.77.6 ( talk ) 12:08, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

You are right but your example is confusing because your link omits the ending period in w:Category:Tiffany & Co. A different example without that issue: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Earth,_Wind_&_Fire . A page name with '&' fails for Category but works for Wikilinks, e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B&O which gives https://pageviews.toolforge.org/massviews/?platform=all-access&agent=user&source=wikilinks&range=latest-20&sort=views&direction=1&view=list&target=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B%26O . Constructing the expected url manually also fails for Category: https://pageviews.toolforge.org/massviews/?platform=all-access&agent=user&source=category&range=latest-20&subjectpage=0&subcategories=0&sort=views&direction=1&view=list&target=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Earth,_Wind_&_Fire . PrimeHunter ( talk ) 17:25, 12 February 2021 (UTC)Pageviews bug report[ edit ]

Fataler Fehler: TypeError: Cannot read property '_meta' of undefined —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 87.116.167.236 ( talk ) 11:07, 24 October 2020

��������������������������������������������������������������������

�������������������������������������������������������������������� ( ���������������� ) 11:20, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

Nach Umbenennung keine Zählung mehr[ edit ]

Nach einer Umbenennung erfolgt keine Zählung mehr für den Zeitraum vor der Umbenennung. Beispiel: de:Aretha Franklin: Amazing Grace hieß bis zum 18.11.19 noch Amazing Grace (Dokumentarfilm) . Die Abrufzahlen für den Zeitraum vor dem 18.11.19 sind nicht mehr ermittelbar, siehe z.B.: hier oder hier . -- Bernd Bergmann ( talk ) 12:59, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

Typo in FAQ[ edit ]

In the FAQ , "definiton " should be "definition". Thanks! Graham87 ( talk ) 04:47, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

Fixed (but not yet deployed). Thanks, MusikAnimal (WMF) ( talk ) 18:21, 13 November 2020 (UTC)API Like Access for Numerical Data[ edit ]

Is is it possible to retrieve json data with a URL rather than using the javascript download in the browser? I am asking because I cannot seem to query page view redirects through the Wikimedia REST API, which Pageviews Analysis does provide. -- Erulas ( talk ) 03:07, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

I second this request. Datumizer ( talk ) 07:44, 1 February 2021 (UTC)Pageviews API - Not found[ edit ]

It seems that the tool does not get new data for some pages, see e. g. this search whose result is: Pageviews API - Not found. -- Jan Kameníček ( talk ) 22:24, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

@ Jan.Kamenicek No data was found for that date range, is the issue. It should instead show 0 pageviews. I'll look into fixing that. Anyway here's a working link: [3] . Best, MusikAnimal (WMF) ( talk ) 22:48, 5 January 2021 (UTC) Ah, I see, thanks. -- Jan Kameníček ( talk ) 22:51, 5 January 2021 (UTC)Userviews analysis is broken[ edit ] Yes check.svg Resolved.

Hello, it seems like the Userviews analysis page is broken. Every time I try to search for an username, regardless of the parameters, I get the following error: "An unknown error occurred when querying Page Creation API". TheStriker ( talk ) 12:35, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

I got the same error message. Best, -- Thomas Dresler ( talk ) 20:51, 5 January 2021 (UTC) Also... Maybe MusikAnimal (WMF) can help? Euro know ( talk ) 22:31, 5 January 2021 (UTC) @ TheStriker , Thomas Dresler , and Euro know : Fixed. Sorry about that! MusikAnimal (WMF) ( talk ) 22:46, 5 January 2021 (UTC)hourly pageviews dumps stopped at 2021-01-06 14:00[ edit ]

I'm looking at https://dumps.wikimedia.org/other/pageviews/2021/2021-01/ and the last file is "pageviews-20210106-140000.gz" i.e January 06, 14:00. For years it is updated hourly, and yesterday it suddenly stopped. Can anyone check it?

Sorry for the late reply. I believe the Analytics team fixed this. If not, you can reach out to the them via their mailing list . Pageviews Analysis is visualizer of data provided by the API. We can't help with any issue involving the dumps. Best, MusikAnimal (WMF) ( talk ) 02:10, 22 January 2021 (UTC)Carl Robert Tielsch[ edit ]

Carl Robert Tielsch (my greatgrandfather, I was born 1954, the great generation gap is due to second marriages) was first married to Marie Töpffer,née Leupold ( this was his first, her second marriage). After her death, he got married to Elisabeth Köhlisch ( not Köhler as presently seen in the article on C.R. Tielsch). So Elisabeth Köhlisch became Elisabeth Tielsch,my greatgrandmaother- which is also my name. Elisabeth Tielsch, Tübingen

Please change the errors in the article to the following correct information:

Marie Töpffer, née Leupold Elisabeth, née Köhlisch —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Rivadavia54 ( talk )

@ Rivadavia54 : This venue is to report bugs or issues with the Pageviews Analysis tool. We can't help with moderating on-wiki content. For that, either fix the page yourself or use the discussion page to request changes. Best, MusikAnimal (WMF) ( talk ) 02:13, 22 January 2021 (UTC)Request: stacked chart[ edit ] Vg project page views short.png

I would like to request a stacked chart that shows the total page views for all pages listed. Example provided. Datumizer ( talk ) 07:57, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Pageview Data for February 9th[ edit ]

Hello, it seems there are no pageviews data for February 9th available. Best, -- Thomas Dresler ( talk ) 14:47, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

Same here. MikutoH ( talk ) 20:15, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

Same here.

Just passing through with my own issue but the documentation does state that it takes 24 hours or more for the API to update Slywriter ( talk ) 04:55, 11 February 2021 (UTC)There was maintenance on the Pageviews API that caused a delay in the data being populated. It should be all caught up now. MusikAnimal (WMF) ( talk ) 17:28, 12 February 2021 (UTC)Potential False Postives in yearly view of 2020[ edit ] https://pageviews.toolforge.org/topviews/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&date=2020&excludes=

1. F5 networks and Media show abnormally low % for mobile views

2. On Android using Chrome and do not see the "report false positives" button mentioned in documentation. (Neither in mobile or desktop mode)

Can find me on en-wiki if need further information

Slywriter

Slywriter ( talk ) 04:54, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

@ Slywriter : I don't know which documentation you refer to but I'm just a user of the tool. Pageviews Analysis#Topviews mentions false positives but not a "report false positives" button. Desktop views of "Media" [4] is clearly dominated by false positives in January and February 2020. "F5 Networks" is fairly evenly spread out in both desktop [5] and mobile [6] . If you go further back then it becomes clear that both desktop [7] and mobile [8] have been inflated since July 2018. Before that desktop [9] and mobile [10] had far lower numbers but desktop still looked hinky. PrimeHunter ( talk ) 19:07, 12 February 2021 (UTC) @ PrimeHunter : when in "Top Views", you get a slightly different faq if you click help [11] which discusses false positives, the key enwiki indicator (desktop exceeds mobile) and instructions to report them from the page. Top views shows F5 Networks at ~10% Mobile and Media at ~2%. Pageviews certainly seems to confirm a huge desktop spike at beginning of 2020 for Media which likely implies a scrape. F5 Networks is more complex as it consistently seems to have a 90 to 10 spread of Desktop to Mobile. Slywriter ( talk ) 04:06, 13 February 2021 (UTC) @ Slywriter : After clicking ✖ to remove F5 Networks as described, I see the "report false positive" link. The link disappears if I reload the page but it reappears if I restore and remove the article again. PrimeHunter ( talk ) 08:47, 13 February 2021 (UTC)Failed wikilinks to massviews[ edit ] Interwiki map

Interwiki map includes toolforge https://iw.toolforge.org/$1 . This can sometimes be used to make working wikilinks via iw.toolforge.org redirects, e.g.:

toolforge:pageviews/?project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Example .

I cannot get it to work with massviews. This url works:

https://iw.toolforge.org/pageviews/massviews/?source=wikilinks&target=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Example

The wikilink version should be:

toolforge:pageviews/massviews/?source=wikilinks&target=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Example

MediaWiki encodes $1 so the actual url becomes:

https://iw.toolforge.org/pageviews/massviews/?source=wikilinks&target=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Example

Toolforge redirects it to:

https://pageviews.toolforge.org/massviews/?source=wikilinks&target=https:/en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Example

That fails because https:// was changed to https:/ with one slash. I would like to link massviews in edit summaries where wikilinks are allowed including interwiki links, but raw url's or external link syntax do not produce links. Is there a workaround? I tried many things, e.g. more than two // with and without url encoding them as /. It all failed, e.g. this which still changes to one slash:

toolforge:pageviews/massviews/?source=wikilinks&target=https:////////en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Example

Is there a way to link massviews without target=(something with //)? I realize the problem is apparently a Toolforge bug/feature in the redirect and not a pageviews bug/feature, but pageviews could make a workaround like accepting a single slash, or if that's too ugly then accept target=en.wikipedia.org so this works:

toolforge:pageviews/massviews/?source=wikilinks&target=en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Example PrimeHunter

PrimeHunter ( talk ) 18:16, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Portuguese article content[ edit ]

Thats an mistake: "atravessa um meio isolante a uma velocidade superior à da luz neste meio, ", means velocity biggest than speed of light, big error in: https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Efeito_Tcherenkov —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 2804:431:e7c3:67e:8939:8604:7e9a:301f ( talk ) 13 February 2021, 07:37 (UTC)

You are only translating a part of it. I don't know Portuguese but according to Google Translate it says "passes through an insulating medium at a speed greater than that of light in this medium". This is correct. If you think nothing can be faster than light then it only applies to a vacuum. See w:Cherenkov radiation if you are better at English. Anyway, it doesn't belong here. If you have an issue with something in the Portuguese Wikipedia then post it there on the talk page or a help page. PrimeHunter ( talk ) 09:01, 13 February 2021 (UTC)Need a monthly list of Wikipedias sorted by number of pageviews[ edit ]

In the Ukrainian Wikipedia every month we prepare and publish "Wiki Herald".

One of the important things in the bulletin is a list of Wikipedias sorted by number of pageviews, like this:

Rank
(Jan 2021)
WP Pageviews
(mln)
Pageviews
Jan 2020
Rank 2020 Pageviews
Jan 2019
Rank
Jan 2019
Pageviews
Jan 2018
Rank
Jan 2018
1 w:en 8 201 8 272 1
2 w:ja 1 167 1 141 2
3 de 1 108 1 062 3
4 sp 991 979 4
5 ru 871 892 5
6 fr 822 788 6
7 it 674 585 7
8 zh 410 398 8
9 pt 306 319 9
10 pl 305 281 10
11 ar 234 218 11
12 fa 217 166 12
13 nl 170 161 13
14 tr 158 66,0 20 (+6)
15 id 134 156 14 (-1)
16 sv 105 101 15 (-1)
17 cz 102 86 16 (-1)
18 he 83,7 (+33 %) 62,7 (+2,0) 23 (+5) 61,5 (+11,6 %) 22 55,1 20 (-2)
19 kr 76,8 (+8 %) 70,9 (-7,1 %) 18 (-1) 76,3 17 (-1)
20 hu 74,9 (+11 %) 67,3 (+9,1 %) 19 (-1) 61,7 (+12,6 %) 21 (+2) 54,8 21 (0)
21 uk 74,6 (+22 %) 61,3 (+8,3 %) 24 (+3) 56,6 (+18,4 %) 24 (+1) 47,8 23 (-1)
22 th 67,1 65,0 (-8,3 %) 22 70,9 (+27,3 %) 18 (-3) 55,7 19 (+1)
23 fi 66,9 65,5 21 (-2) 65,5 (+3,9 %) 19 (-1) 63,0 18 (-1)
24 hi 65,8 72,6 (+17 %) 17 (-7) 62,2 (+38,5 %) 20 (+3) 44,9 24 (+4)
25 vi 65,6 59,2 (+0,3 %) 25 59,0 (+10,9 %) 23 (-1) 53,2 22 (-1)
26 ro 55,4 43,2 (+0,9 %) 26 42,8 (+7,5 %) 25 39,8 25 (0)
27 el 51,1 37,9 27 37,7 (+10,5 %) 26 34,1 27 (-1)
28 no 35,7 37,2 28 37,4 (+3,9 %) 27 36,0 26 (-1)
29 da 31,1 30,1 29 33,1 (+10,3 %) 28 30,0 30 (+2)

I arrange the list of the first 29 Wikipediae manually, so I am not sure if this list for January 2021 is correct. Probably some language versions are missing.

It would be convenient to have the list created automatically. -- Perohanych ( talk ) 07:47, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

I'm sorry, this functionality isn't offered by the Pageviews suite of applications. You will need a developer to build this for you. The /metrics/pageviews/aggregate I think is the relevant API endpoint for this data (total pageviews across all pages of a project). Best, MusikAnimal (WMF) ( talk ) 20:49, 22 February 2021 (UTC)shaking image[ edit ]

Dear Wikipedia, Under the website 'Greenvile_Collins' at 'pageview' and then 'pageview analysis', the broadcast image shakes continuously and badly. Joseph Dessiou 2A00:23C5:258A:2A00:35E1:C0C6:FB51:8A60 10:02, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Pageviews bug report[ edit ]

Hi, page not loading 2.53.29.10 01:26, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Please see the top of this page. We are going to need more information to help you. MusikAnimal (WMF) ( talk ) 20:35, 22 February 2021 (UTC)Seite Damast[ edit ]

Ich habe vor mindestens 1 Woche die Seite "Damast" bearbeitet. Die Änderungen werden aber immer noch nicht angezeigt. Wolfgang Uhr

Retrieved from " https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Pageviews_Analysis&oldid=21146417 "Navigation menuPersonal toolsNot logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Namespaces Content page Discussion VariantsViews Read Edit Add topic View history MoreSearch
Navigation Main page Wikimedia News Translations Recent changes Random page Help Babel Community Wikimedia Resource Center Wikimedia Forum Mailing lists Requests Babylon Reports Research Planet Wikimedia Beyond the Web Meet Wikimedians Events Movement affiliates Donate Tools What links here Related changes Special pages Permanent link Page information Print/export Create a book Download as PDF Printable version This page was last edited on 24 February 2021, at 10:34.Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License ; additional terms may apply. See Terms of Use for details. Privacy policy About Meta Disclaimers Mobile view Developers Statistics Cookie statement Wikimedia Foundation Powered by MediaWiki
© 2014-2021 ЯВИКС - все права защищены.
Наши контакты